Editorial method

How this publication follows programmes, checks sources and explains scientific evidence.

Longevity Frontier follows selected research programmes in AI discovery and rejuvenation biotechnology. The record includes experiments, trial milestones and company disclosures. Each source has a date and a description of what it establishes.

Start with the claim

“Changes gene expression”, “improves visual function” and “extends lifespan” describe different outcomes. A dossier identifies the proposed mechanism, then checks which outcomes the experiments measured.

Human studies are read in their original context: participants, comparison groups, duration and endpoints. A small safety study can establish information about tolerability in that setting. Its design may leave effectiveness and longer follow-up unresolved.

Keep the records separate

A programme’s development stage and the strength of its evidence are separate entries. The record also distinguishes cells, animals and humans. Approval concerns a specified indication and jurisdiction.

AI’s contribution is described when a source documents it. An organisation’s use of computation does not by itself establish AI’s role in every programme.

Sources and conflicts

Sources include primary papers, trial registries, institutional records and company disclosures. A company announcement establishes what the company reported; it may precede access to study data. Funding, affiliations and limitations appear beside the experimental account when reported.

Literature searches help find studies. The studies supporting an account are identified individually. Where a source cannot establish a detail, the dossier states the gap.

Revision

The development history records dated events and preserves earlier findings. A correction should identify the changed claim and the source supporting the change. Review dates change when the relevant account is checked or revised.

This edition’s sources were checked on 4 October 2026. Events after that date require a further editorial review.

Editorial responsibility and assistance

AI tools assisted with research, drafting, artwork and site development.

The site is edited under the professional identity Dr T Smith, an organic chemist and science educator. Initials keep this project separate from unrelated professional work. No specialist clinical credentials are claimed.

Contact and corrections

Search the publication

Search programme histories and research articles.